SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 604

H.N.TILHARI
B. S. YADIYURAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MAHALINGAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK HARANAHAFLI, C.V.NAGESH, H.J.Sundar Kumar, K.SUMAN

H. N. TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner has sought a declaration to the effect that declaration of election of the respondent No. 1 vide Annexure-A declaring respondent No. 1 as returned candidate from 167. Shikaripura Assembly Constituency, is illegal, null and void as per Section 100 (b) and (d) (ii) and (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and for declaration that the petitioner is the returned candidate from the said constituency as per Section 101 (b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

( 2 ) THE election to the eleventh Karnataka Legislative Assembly from 167, Shikaripura Constituency and to the 13th Lok Sabha for 21 Shimoga Parliamentary Constituency were held simultaneously on 11-9-1999. The result of that election was declared on 6-10-1999. The 1st respondent in the petition namely Mahalingappa was declared elected to the Legislative Assembly from this constituency. The petitioner has sought the declaration of election to be null and void.

( 3 ) THE grounds of election and the allegations made thereunder in the election petition are said to be under Section 100 (b) and (d ). The election petitioner in the petition has impleaded the
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top