SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 625

R.V.RAVEENDRAN
D. V. LAKSHMANA RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK B.HINCHIGIRI, Ashok N.Nayak, M.S.GOPALKRISHNA

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER claims to be the owner of the following lands situated in udayagiri and bhuvanahalli villages, devanahalli taluk, Bangalore rural district.

( 21 ) IN view of the above the prayer for declaration that the acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 11-a of la act is rejected. The petition is disposed of subject to the observations in the preceding para in regard to the passing of the award within three months of receipt of the order with additional relief. Parties to bear their respective costs.

--- *** ---

.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top