SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 662

R.GURURAJAN
JOGENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURESH MANJULAPUR – Respondent


Advocates:
S.P.SHANKAR, VIGHNESHVARA SHASTRY

R. GURURAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is posted for consideration of la. No. Ii for vacating stay and with the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the insurance company in this court in this appeal. The respondent filed a claim petition, seeking compensation of Rs. 1,31,500 for the death of one kotrappa manjulapur in a road accident. The matter was contested. The tribunal has allowed the application and has awarded a compensation of Rs. 2,00,000. 00 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of petition till the date of payment. The said order is challenged in this appeal by the insurance company and the owner.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned counsel on either side. Sri s. p. shankar, learned counsel for the insurance company contended that the tribunal cannot grant compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs in this case in view of the restricted claim of Rs. 1,35,500. 00 by the claimant in the claim petition.

( 4 ) PER contra, Sri vigneswar s. Shastry, learned counsel for the respondent contended that the tribunal on evidence found that the compensation awarded is just and proper. After hearing the learned counsel on both the sides i pass the fo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top