SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 5

H.L.DATTU
HARIHARA AYYAR A. – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, BOMBAY – Respondent


Advocates:
Basavaprabhu S.Patil, N.B.BHAT

H. L. DATTU, J.

( 1 ) A retired employee/officer of state bank of india, is before this court inter alia seeking the following reliefs: (A) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or order to quash the impugned communication dated October 4, 1996 issued by the third respondent in No. Br/geri/262 (Annexure-B ). (B) to issue a writ of certiorari quashing Rule 3 (1) (a) of the state bank of India retired employees' medical benefit scheme to the extent it imposes condition of 30 years of pensionable service to be entitled for the benefit of the scheme and consequently, declare and direct respondents to treat those, who are eligible for payment of pension under the state bank of India employees' pensionary fund rules as eligible to the membership of the state bank of India retired employees' medical benefit scheme. (C) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to amend the rules governing the membership to the state bank of India retired employees' medical benefit scheme to the effect that those employees, who have retired/will retire, who are eligible for the payment of pension under the state bank of India employees' pension fu






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top