CHIDANANDA ULLAL
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIJAPUR – Appellant
Versus
SHANTAVVA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, bijapur, thereby challenging order dated 31. 7. 1996 in No. WCA:sr:81 of 1995 passed by the Workmen's Compensation commissioner, Bijapur. In passing the said order, the Workmen's Compensation commissioner while allowing the claim made by the respondents had awarded a sum of Rs. 55,251 together with interest at 6 per cent per annum.
( 2 ) THE learned Additional Government advocate, Mr. Ashok Mensinkai, had taken me through the impugned order under challenge. He had also taken me through the facts of the case. While urging the grounds made out in the instant appeal, it was argued by him that the Workmen's compensation Commissioner (hereinforth in brief referred to for convenience as 'the wcc') had totally erred in awarding compensation without there being evidence as to at what point of time the alleged accident had taken place. According to him, the alleged accident resulting in the death of one Yellanagouda, the husband of the respondent No. 1 and the father of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 had not at all taken place during the course of employment and inasmuch as admittedly the accident had taken pl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.