SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 61

CHIDANANDA ULLAL
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIJAPUR – Appellant
Versus
SHANTAVVA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK MENSINKAI, D.NAGARAJ

CHIDANANDA ULLAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer, bijapur, thereby challenging order dated 31. 7. 1996 in No. WCA:sr:81 of 1995 passed by the Workmen's Compensation commissioner, Bijapur. In passing the said order, the Workmen's Compensation commissioner while allowing the claim made by the respondents had awarded a sum of Rs. 55,251 together with interest at 6 per cent per annum.

( 2 ) THE learned Additional Government advocate, Mr. Ashok Mensinkai, had taken me through the impugned order under challenge. He had also taken me through the facts of the case. While urging the grounds made out in the instant appeal, it was argued by him that the Workmen's compensation Commissioner (hereinforth in brief referred to for convenience as 'the wcc') had totally erred in awarding compensation without there being evidence as to at what point of time the alleged accident had taken place. According to him, the alleged accident resulting in the death of one Yellanagouda, the husband of the respondent No. 1 and the father of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 had not at all taken place during the course of employment and inasmuch as admittedly the accident had taken pl













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top