SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 72

CHIDANANDA ULLAL
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JHONSA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.C.SEETHA RAMA RAO, S.V.PRAKASH

C. ULLAL, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are directed against two independent orders dated 8. 7. 1997 passed by the workmen's compensation commissioner, shimoga, henceforth in brief referred to as the wcc. When the first appeal herein is directed against the order in case No. Wca:fc: cr:15 of 1993 the second appeal is directed against the order in case No. Wca: fc:cr:14 of 1993. Both the appeals have been filed by the insurance company.

( 2 ) THE appellant insurance company in both the appeals is represented by the learned counsel Mr. B. c. Seetharama rao, whereas the contesting respondents- claimants are represented by the learned counsel Mr. S. V. Prakash.

( 3 ) THE facts as i see are similarly placed. That one ansaar and nazeer, both fullblood brothers, died at about 9. 30 p. m. On 21. 12. 1992 in a road accident near petrol bunk situated at c. n. Road, bhadravathi when they were changing the wheel of the tractor and that they were claimed to be the workers under their father, one rasool sab, son of buden sab. It was the case of the respondents-claimants that both the deceased persons were engaged as workers/ coolies in the agricultural land of their father and that on the relevant



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top