SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 334

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, S.R.BANNURMATH
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
H. GANESH RAO – Respondent


Advocates:
B.MANOHAR, K.N.SUBHA READY, PRASAD SUBBANNA, RANGANATHA S.JOIS

P. V. REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of writ appeals arise out of the writ petitions filed by the respondents herein who are working as second division assistants and typists in the commercial taxes department of Karnataka state. They were initially appointed by the deputy commissioner (ct) of various places mostly during the years 1985 and 1986 on daily wages at Rs. 15/- per day. Their temporary appointments were subject to termination on appointment of regular candidates selected by Karnataka public service commission. Some of the appointments were for duration of four months or so, which were later on extended from time to time. There was an interview and selection before such appointment orders were issued though the details and modalities of such selection are not available. The respondents were appointed against the existing vacancies of sanctioned posts. It transpires from the correspondence that the commissioner of commercial taxes has been pleading for extension of services of these daily wage employees till the candidates selected by service commission were allotted. He also addressed letters to the government to regularise services of similarly situated employees in implemen


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top