SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 351

ASHOK BHAN, CHIDANANDA ULLAL
D. P. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHOK HARANAHAFLI, H.B.DATAR, K.S.DESAI, N.K.Gupta

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal Is directed against the orders dt. 23-8-2000 in W. P. No. 10256/1990 passed by the learned single Judge, in passing whereof, the learned single Judge in entertaining a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach this Court yet again on the very same cause of action, passed an order granting permission to the appellant writ petitioner to withdraw the petition and rejected the prayer for granting liberty as prayed for as above.

( 2 ) THE appellant writ petitioner herein is represented by the learned counsel Sri K. S. Desai, whereas the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 are represented by the learned counsel Sri Ashok Harnahalli and respondents Nos. 4 and 5 are represented by Sri N. K. Gupta.

( 3 ) THE short point involved in the instant writ appeal is whether the learned single Judge was justified in rejecting the prayer for granting liberty to file fresh petition on the very same cause of action, upon which the original writ petition in question came to be filed, while granting permission to withdraw the writ petition.

( 4 ) BEFORE proceeding further, we feel it appropriate to narrate here the contents of the memo filed by the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top