SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 341

MOHAMED ANWAR
BHEEMASENACHARYA SRINIVASACHARYA GUDI – Appellant
Versus
GADAG VEERA-NARAYANA DEV – Respondent


Advocates:
Chandrakant R.Goulay, R.B.Pasappagol, Subhash B.Adi

MOHAMED ANWAR, J.

( 1 ) ALL these three civil revisions are filed by the eight plaintiffs in O. S. No. 14/1997 pending on the file of the Court of the III Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Gadag, and the common respondents herein are the defendants in that suit. They are filed against the respective orders of the lower appellate Court by which the plaintiffs' I. A. No. 1 under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC came to be dismissed and the trial Court's order allowing defendant No. 1's I. A. No. 9 under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC stands affirmed.

( 2 ) THE said O. S. No. 14/1997 of the petitioners-plaintiffs was instituted in the trial Court on 6-1-1997 against respondents (hereinafter referred to as 'the defendants') for the following main reliefs :" (20) It is Most Humbly Prayed and Submitted that : (a) Plaintiffs be declared as hereditary Pricharika and Parupatyagar of Veera-narayan and other temples in the vicinity along with Defendant No. 2. (b) The notice of termination dated 13-10-1995 and the Resolution of Defendant No. 1 dated 28-9-1995 be declared as void and not binding upon the plaintiffs. (c) It be declared that there are two turns (Pale) of service of Paricharika and Parupatyag

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top