SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 378

S.N.KUMAR
M. L. BALARAM – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.SAMPATH KUMAR, U.Ishwar Bhat

S. N. KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has preferred this CRP against the order dated 29th august, 2000 passed by the Court below rejecting the application under order 33, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC and refusing to grant permission to sue as an indigent person.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs case in brief are as hereunder: the plaintiff-Sri M. L. Balaram has stated in paragraph 3 of the plaint that the plaintiff is a proprietary concern which was carrying on business in manufacture and export of ready-made garments to various countries. The plaintiff is represented by its proprietor Sri M. L. Balaram. The plaintiff had approached the defendant for several credit facilities to set up an industry and the defendant has granted the money. The defendant bank has failed to protect the interest of the plaintiff by taking adequate steps and on account of the negligent act on the part of the defendant the plaintiff suffered huge loss in the business and he could not comply with his obligations with the foreign buyers. As a result he has incurred a loss and therefore he has filed the present suit claiming damages of Rs. 6,63,17,801-00. He has invoked Order 33, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC and has requested the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top