S.N.KUMAR
M. L. BALARAM – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK, BANGALORE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff has preferred this CRP against the order dated 29th august, 2000 passed by the Court below rejecting the application under order 33, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC and refusing to grant permission to sue as an indigent person.
( 2 ) THE plaintiffs case in brief are as hereunder: the plaintiff-Sri M. L. Balaram has stated in paragraph 3 of the plaint that the plaintiff is a proprietary concern which was carrying on business in manufacture and export of ready-made garments to various countries. The plaintiff is represented by its proprietor Sri M. L. Balaram. The plaintiff had approached the defendant for several credit facilities to set up an industry and the defendant has granted the money. The defendant bank has failed to protect the interest of the plaintiff by taking adequate steps and on account of the negligent act on the part of the defendant the plaintiff suffered huge loss in the business and he could not comply with his obligations with the foreign buyers. As a result he has incurred a loss and therefore he has filed the present suit claiming damages of Rs. 6,63,17,801-00. He has invoked Order 33, Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC and has requested the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.