SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 405

K.R.PRASADA RAO, M.F.SALDANHA
STATE THROUGH HASSAN CITY – Appellant
Versus
LOKESH – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.Anasuya, MOHAN SHANTANA GOUDAR, S.SHANKARAPPA

M. F. SALDANHA, J.

( 1 ) WE have heard the learned state public prosecutor as also the learned counsel Smt. G. s. anusuya on behalf of the original accused 1.

( 2 ) WE need to mention that some of the other accused are absconding and non-bailable warrants have been issued by this court but so farnet been executed. The difficulty that has arisen is that accused 1 who has undergone more than 5 years in custody has been arrested under the non-bailable warrant issued and he is at present in custody. The learned advocate has presented an application for bail. The learned state public prosecutor very rightly submitted that normally he would not have opposed the grant of bail, but that the accused persons in these dacoity cases have displayed a tendency of moving from place to place or absconding as a result of which it becomes impossible to dispose of the appeal. His request to the court was, therefore, that the appeal to the court was, therefore, that the appeal itself should be heard and disposed of on merits and Smt. Anusuya, the counsel has agreed to this, pursuant to which, we have heard the learned advocates on both the sides on merits. The learned state public prosecutor submits t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top