SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 442

S.N.KUMAR
PRAHALAD NARASEMHA JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
VEDAVATHI ALIAS LEELAVATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.V.THIMMAPPIAH, H.L.Narasimha Murthy

S. N. KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent herein who is the wife has filed M. C. No. 11 of 1992 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, Dharwad, a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. The said petition was filed on 25-2-1992. On 8-1-1993 the respondent entered appearance and is contesting the matter. On 1-6-1994 the wife made an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955 for maintenance pendente lite. The said application was opposed by the husband. After considering the rival contentions by the impugned order the Court below awarded a maintenance of Rs. 1,000. 00 per month and directed the husband to pay the maintenance from the date of petition, namely 25-2-1992. The present revision petition is filed challenging the direction to pay maintenance from the date of petition till the date of the husband's appearance.

( 2 ) SRI H. L. Narasimha Murthy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, contends the wife is entitled to the payment of maintenance from the day she made the application under Section 24 and not for a period prior to the said date. Even assuming that she is held to be entitled, it cannot be for a per







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top