SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 610

N.K.PATIL, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
SHANTA RATHOD – Appellant
Versus
MAHANTESH – Respondent


Advocates:
S.P.SHANKAR, SUBASH B.ADI

RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) M. F. A. No. 3535 of 1999 and Cross-objection No. 28 of 2000 arise from M. V. C. No. 1768 of 1998, on the file of Addl. M. A. C. T. , Saundatti. M. F. A. No. 3536 of 1999 and Cross-objection No. 29 of 2000 arise from m. V. C. No. 1769 of 1988. They relate to the same accident and involve common questions. Appeals are filed by the owner and the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident and the cross-objections are filed by the claimants. For convenience the appellants will also be referred to as the owner and insurer. The cross-objectors will also be referred to as claimants or by name.

( 2 ) THE respective claimant in the two claim petitions (Mahantesh B. Hanashi and Ashok Baligar) alleged that on 31. 8. 98 when Mahantesh was proceeding on scooter bearing registration No. CTB 6243 from ugargol to Saundatti, it developed some snag; therefore, he got down and along with one Ashok Baligar started pushing the scooter towards Yellamma Gudda; that at that time a Tempo Trax bearing registration No. GA 02-C 5310, driven in a rash and negligent manner, came from the opposite direction at a great speed; and its driver lost control of the said vehicle and dashed aga












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top