( 1 ) THE 12th respondent in the Court below has preferred the above two revision petitions challenging the orders passed by the Court below holding that the said Court has got jurisdiction to decide the application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to in short 'act') and also the order rejecting the request of the 12th respondent to reject the plaint under Order 7, Rule 11-A of the CPC for want of cause of action.

( 2 ) THE first respondent herein filed an application under Section 9 of the Act against the petitioner herein and other eleven parties for an interim order by way of injunction restraining the respondent 1 from collecting any amount by way of rent from respondents 2 to 11 in occupation of the portion of the property belonging to the firm at No, 71, millers Road, Bangalore, till the award is passed by the Tribunal and for appointing the petitioner jointly with the respondent as joint receivers to manage the affairs of the firm till the order from the Tribunal and for interim orders. In the said application a prayer was made for interim orders. As the respondents had entered Caveat they were notified.