SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 637

CHANDRASHEKARAIAH
SYNDICATE BANK – Appellant
Versus
CHAMUNDI INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates:
Annapurna Bevinje, TUKURAM S.PAL, VKK Nair

CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is by the Bank challenging the order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore, dismissing the application for recovery of money from defendants 1 to 3 filed by the Bank holding it is not maintainable on the ground that the application is hit by Rule 10 of the debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules' ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner Bank filed an application under Sec. 17 of the Recoveries of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for recovery of a sum of Rs. 12,90,934/- with cost, current and future interest. The respondents who are defendants before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') have not disputed or denied the transaction entered into between the Bank and respondents 1 to 3. Respondent 3 in the statement of objections filed before the Tribunal has stated that the Bank has unjustly combined the two distinct causes of action on two distinct loans in an effort to bring their total to an amount exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/- with a view to avoid recourse to the normal Courts of law and to unjustly avail























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top