SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 688

H.RANGAVITTALACHAR
RAMANAGOUDA SIDDANAGOUDA – Appellant
Versus
BASAVANTRAYA MADIVALAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.S.Patil, C.B.SRINIVASAN, JAYAVITTAL KOLAR, K.I.BHATTA, SHANTHA W.JOSHI

H. RANGAVITTALACHAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's second appeal.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the filing of this second appeal as gathered, from records are as under:

( 3 ) PLAINTIFF filed a suit O. S. 6/75 on the file of the Civil Judge,bijapur for a declaration that alienation made by defendant No. 6 to the suit in favour of defendant Nos. 1, 4 and 5 is not binding, and declare him as the owner of suit properties and for consequential relief of possession; suit properties are 2 items of agricultural lands bearing sy. No. 94/2 of Yelwar Village, Basavanabagewadi Taluk measuring 15 acres 24 guntas, 21 acres and 34 guntas of land in sy. No. 3 of Mannur Taluk.

( 4 ) THE suit properties originally belonged to one Hanumatharaya. He had 3 sons Ramchandrappa, Saheb Gowda, Shivasang-appa. Plaintiffs are the children of Shivasangappa. After the death of Saheb Gowda, his widow adopted Basavanagowda Saheb Gowda - defendant No. 6 in the present suit (since deceased by his legal representatives ).

( 5 ) THE said Basavanagowda Sahebgowda (defendant No. 6 in the present suit) had originally filed the suit O. S. 67/48 against the present plaintiffs and others on the file of the C




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top