SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Kar) 745

H.N.NARAYAN
SUJATHA – Appellant
Versus
H. M. MALLAPPA NAIK – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.VENKATESH, D.R.NAGARAJA

H. N. NARAYAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the claimants is directed against the judgment and award of the Tribunal restricting the compensation to a sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- claimed by them in the claim petition as against the global compensation of Rs 5,86,940/ -. which according to the Tribunal is just and reasonable compensation.

( 2 ) IT is contended by the appellants among other grounds of appeal that the Tribunal has erred in restricting the award to the sum claimed in the claim petition, which is against the provisions of Motor Vehicles act, as the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act has given wide powers to the Tribunal to make just and reasonable awards. Simultaneously, the claimants have also claimed for enhancement of compensation with interest at 12% instead of 6% granted by the Tribunal.

( 3 ) AN application under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure is filed by the claimants-appellants for amendment of the claim petition to amend the quantum of compensation from Rs. 3,50. 000/- to rs. 5. 86,940/ -. Insofar as the amendment application filed by the appellants is concerned, though it is filed after a long delay and is an afterthought, the said application is made













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top