SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 66

T.S.THAKUR
CAROLINE PERPETUA EARDLEY – Appellant
Versus
GLENN B. EARDLEY – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.MOHAN KRISHNA, S.N.ASHWATHANARAYANA

TIRATH S. THAKUR, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is directed against an order passed by civil Judge (Senior Division) and Principal Judicial Magistrate First class, K. G. F. , on an application under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce act, 1869 seeking interim maintenance for the petitioner-wife. The application has by the said order been dismissed on the ground that the appellant-wife is in a position to maintain herself.

( 2 ) THE parties are Christians by faith. They appear to have tied the knot in the year 1984 and raised three children out of the wedlock, all of whom are females. The respondent-husband is a driller in an oil rig and appears to be in the employment of a company based in Abu Dhabi. He has in a petition under Sections 10 and 11 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, sought dissolution of marriage on the ground that the wife has committed adultery since the solemnisation of the marriage. The wife has denied the allegations and is resisting the prayer for divorce. The matter has remained pending before the Trial Court since the year 1995.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the above proceedings, LA. No; XIII was filed by the petitioner-wife in March 2000 seeking alimony pe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top