SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 123

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.L.MANJUNATH
THOMAS MATES GUDINHO – Appellant
Versus
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.V.SHANTHARAJU, KRISHNA S.DIXIT, V.P.Kulkarni

R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a permanent resident of Karwar City and a voter of No. 172, Karwar Assembly Constituency. In the 1999 elections, results of which were declared on 6-10-1999, one Vasanth Kamalakar Astonikar was declared as having been elected. That has been challenged by the 4th respondent in Election Petition No. 19/1999 pending on the file of this Court. In the said election petition, the 4th respondent has sought the following reliefs : (I) a declaration that the election of V. K. Astonikar to fill seat No. 172-Karwar Assembly Constituency is void under Section 100 (1) (b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, for having committed corrupt practice under Section 123 (3) of the said Act. (II) For a declaration that he has been duly elected from the said Constituency under Section 101 (a) of the Act and declare him as having been elected under Section 101 (b) of the Act for having secured more number of valid votes than the said V. K. Astonikar who has been declared as elected on account of the corrupt practice by him.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of the said petition, the elected candidate namely, V. K. Astonikar was murdered on 19-2-2000. Having
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top