M.P.CHINNAPPA
N. RAJACHAR – Appellant
Versus
KODANDARAMA – Respondent
( 1 ) SINCE common questions of law on the basis of identical facts were raised by the Advocates appearing for the petitioners, after hearing both the parties, these petitions are disposed off by this order.
( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case in Cri. P. No. 3650 of 1939 are that the respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners alleging that they are attached to Navodaya Sahakara Bank Limited, Malleswaram, Bangalore in one capacity or the other and they committed fraudulent acts in their dealing with the Bank, thereby defrauding the Bank to the extent of Rs. 80 lakhs and therefore, the in charge Secretary of the Bank filed a complaint against the partners/proprietors of those business establishments in p. C. R. No. 381 of 1998 on the file of the 7th Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City alleging that they committed offence punishable under Sections 403, 420, 464, 511 read with section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The Court was pleased to refer the complaint to the Inspector of Police, Malleswaram Police Station, bangalore City under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 30-3-1998. However, the learned Magistrate recalled
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.