SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 284

R.V.RAVEENDRAN
VEERABADHRAPPA – Appellant
Versus
JAGADISHGOUDA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.B.PRABHAKAR, S.S.Patil, T.N.RAGHUPATHY, VIGHNESHVARA SHASTRY

RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS herein were respondents 5 and 6 in W. P. Nos. 21974-75/1998. Respondents 1 and 2 herein were the petitioners, respondents 3 and 4 herein were respondents 1 and 2 and respondents 5 and 3 here in were respondents 3 and 4 in the said writ Petitions.

( 2 ) LATE Chatura Chand Shah (father of respondents 5 and 6) was the owner of Sy. No. 61/1 measuring 7acres 6 guntas and respondent No. 6 was the owner of Sy. No. 60/2 measuring 12 acres 8 guntas in Choudapur Village, Biligi Taluk, Bagalkot District. Respondents No. 6 sold land bearing in Sy. No. 60/2 in favour of second appellant under sale deed dated 4. 3. 1982 for a consideration of 25,000/- Chatura Chand Shah sold land bearing Sy. No. 61/1 to the first appellant under sale deed dated 20. 10. 1982 for a consideration of Rs. 25,000/00. The Sub-Registrar, Biligi (fourth respondent) being of the opinion that documents were undervalued, kept them pending by assigning pending numbers and issued notices dated 30. 11. 1983 to the appellants informing that the sale deeds in their favour were undervalued and that the correct value was Rs. 1,91,300/-and Rs. 3,16,450/ -. The said notices required the first appellan


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top