( 1 ) PETITIONER is a practising Advocate at Bangalore. He has challenged the order of VI Additional C. M. M. , Bangalore, (passed in C. C. No. 14833/1996), who has rejected an application filed by the petitioner under Section 319 of Cr. P. C. The petitioner who preferred to argue his own case by wearing Robes has again raised an old controversy settled by the Bench of this Court in T. Venkanna v. The Hon'ble High Court of Mysore by its Registrar, AIR 1973 Mysore 127. I shall shortly take up that question, after considering the legality and correctness of the impugned order.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has narrated in his petition the circumstances under which he was compelled to make the application under Section 319 of Cr. P. C. It is his case that he filed two private complaints before the Additional C. J. M. , Bangalore, in the year 1992, in P. C. R. No. 27/92 and P. C. R. No. 30/92 against one C. B. Ramamurthy, alleging the offences punishable under Section 506 (b) of the I. P. C. Those two complaints were referred to the Deputy Superintendent of Police for investigation and report. He thereafter submitted another complaint before the Ulsoor Gate Police Station and i