M.S.RAJENDRA PRASAD, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
MEHIBOOBSAB – Appellant
Versus
UPALOKAYUKTA – Respondent
( 1 ) SRI nagarajulu naidu, learned additional government advocate is directed to take notice for respondents 1 and 2. Sri Sri nivasa rao, learned counsel is directed to take notice for respondent 3.
( 2 ) PETITIONER claims that he is working as junior engineer in Karnataka power transmission corporation limited, third respondent herein. On 5-11-1997 one gopal pandurang pawar gave a complaint to the police inspector attached to lokayukta, bijapur, that petitioner had made a demand for illegal gratification. On the basis of the said complaint, a raid/trap was held and the petitioner was prosecuted in special case No. 20 of 1998 on the file of the special judge, bijapur charging him with the offence of demanding and accepting illegal gratification of Rs. 250. 00 for providing electrical supply to the newly constructed house of complainant's grandfather, punishable under Secrions 7 and 13 (l) (d) read with Secrion 13 (2) of the Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1988. Before the special judge, seven witnesses were examined. Of the seven witnesses, P. W. 5 was the police inspector who laid the trap, P. W. 6 was the sanctioning authority, P. W. 7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.