SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 364

B.PADMARAJ, D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
SUBASHCHAND JAIN – Appellant
Versus
GANAPATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
RAVI G.SABHAHIT, S.V.HEGDE MUKHAND

D. V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the injured claimant in a motor accident is for enhancement of the quantum of compensation in respect of the injury suffered by him in the accident.

( 2 ) THE claimant/appellant was a passenger in a tempo which was involved in the accident. The claimant suffered extensive injuries particularly as resulted in fracture of right femur, fracture of right zygomatic complex, fracture of nasal bridge, fracture of noso eluamoidal, fracture of mandible and other injuries. He has also suffered injuries to his face. The injured appellant underwent hospitalisation for a long period of 6 months and had to undergo operations in respect of the fracture to his leg. A steel rod has been fixed and for removal of the same he had to undergo further operation. He incurred considerable medical expenses. The claimant was a businessman doing business in manganese ore.

( 3 ) THE Tribunal after considering the nature of injuries sustained by the claimant, the period of hospitalisation, medical expenses incurred etc. , awarded compensation as under: Towards injuries

. . . . . .

Rs. 47,000/-


. (comprising of Rs. 15,000/- for fracture of femur, Rs. 15,000/-for fra




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top