SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 358

B.PADMARAJ, D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
FAKEERAPPA – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA CEMENT PIPE FACTORY – Respondent


Advocates:
H.G.Ramesh, Lokesh Malavalli, R.H.Patil

SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles act is against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, dharwad, awarding a sum of Rs. 2,00,000 as compensation to the parents of one yallappa Angadi who died in the accident involving two motor vehicles.

( 2 ) THE application had been characterised as one under section 163-A read with section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

( 3 ) THE application had been examined by the Tribunal as one under section 166 as is obvious on a perusal of the judgment and award. The trial court had in fact framed an issue relating to the negligence aspect on the part of the driver of the truck bearing No. KA 25-4107 and answered this issue positively. The Claims Tribunal then proceeded to quantify the quantum of compensation payable to the claimants. On applying the principles governing an application of this nature, the Tribunal held that the driver of the truck bearing no. KA 25-4107 was liable to pay the compensation amount.

( 4 ) MR. Lokesh Malavalli, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the tribunal ought to have considered application under section 163-A and it is the submission of the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top