SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 352

S.R.BANNURMATH
ABDUL HAQ – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.BHAT, R.B.DESHAPANDE, SHIVASVAMY

S. R. BANNURMATH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned High court Government Pleader of the State (respondents 1 to 3 ).

( 2 ) THOUGH the legal representatives of respondent 4 are served, but have remained unrepresented. Since the matter is old and the case is coming up regularly both in warning list and the regular hearing list, without further waiting for their appearance, with the assistance of learned High Court Government Pleader, the matter is taken up for final consideration as it involves pure question of law.

( 3 ) THE subject-matter of the writ petition is an agricultural land bearing S. No. 285 measuring 11 guntas situated at Haladipur Village in honnavar Taluka. One Gouri d/o Masti Mukri, now represented by the l. Rs. respondents 4 (a) to 4 (g) was the tenant of the land in question.

( 4 ) AFTER coming into force the Karnataka Land Reforms Act as amended by Act 1 of 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the K. L. R. Act'), the said Gouri filed an application in Form 7 before the Land Tribunal for conferment of occupancy rights. After holding due enquiry the Land tribunal conferred the occupancy rights and subsequently on 21st June, 1981 occup






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top