SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 353

K.SREEDHAR RAO
IVAN ANAND D SOUZA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
S.G.Bhagawan, S.G.RAJENDRA REDDY

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petition filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. for quashing of the proceedings in C. C. No. 440/2001 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Chikkaballapur. The petitioners are the accused against whom the police have laid a charge-sheet for committing offences punishable under Sections 307 and 420, IPC r/w Secs. 3 and 4 of D. P. Act. The prosecution case reveals that the accused No. 1 fell in love with one Mary Shaila Fereira when the lady was studying in Karkala. The first petitioner is the native and resident of Karkala. The parents of the petitioners and as well Miss Marie Shaila and her parents agreed for a marriage between them according to the customary rights. Pursuant to which on 29-12-2001 a betrothal ceremony took place at Chikkaballapur, where the mother of Mari Shaila Fereira was staying on account of her employment and it was also agreed that the marriage has to be performed at Imaculate Heart Church, Nakre in Karkala. It is said that sometime after the function, the petitioners demanded dowry of Rs. 5,00,000/- failing which they threatened that the proposed marriage would not come through. It is said that the girls side all the prepa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top