SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 453

G.C.BHARUKA
K. R. SUBBARAJU – Appellant
Versus
VASAVI TRADING CO – Respondent


Advocates:
H.N.Prakash

G. C. BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant has preferred this civil revision petition under S. 115 of the Code of civil Procedure. The suit is one for recovery of money and other consequential reliefs.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs had filed I. A. No. 6 seeking amendment to the plaint for incorporating clause 2 (a), taking a stand that the plaintiffs instead of carrying on business as a partnership as originally pleaded, they were doing so as members of their Hindu undivided family. By the impugned order, the Court below has allowed the amendment. The question to be attended at the threshold is as to whether as a consequence of amendment to S. 115 of the CPC by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 (Act 46/1999), which has come into force with effect from 1-7-2002, the present civil revision petition is at all entertainable.

( 3 ) SECTION 115 CPC before its amendment by CPC (Amendment) Act, 1999 (46/1999) read as under :-115. Revision (1)- The High Court may call for the record of any case which has been decided by any Court subordinate to such High Court and in which no appeal lies thereto, and if such Subordinate Court appears- (a) to have exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it b















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top