SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 491

M.S.RAJENDRA PRASAD
K. N. SOMASUNDARA – Appellant
Versus
B. LINGARAJU – Respondent


Advocates:
H.R.RENUKA, P.S.Manjunath, Shivararnu

M. S. RAJENDRA PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS Memorandum of First Appeal by the appellant is filed under section 173 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), challenging the validity and legality of the judgment dated 25-11-1996, passed in M. V. C. No. 631 of 1992 and other cases, on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mandya, wherein the learned Member had awarded a compensation of Rs. 53,000/- to the appellant on account of the injuries sustained by the appellant in a motor vehicle accident which had taken place on 3-5-1992 involving a K. S. R. T. C. bus bearing Regn. No. KA 09. F. 1179 on mysore-Bangalore Road near gate of Siddaiahna Koppal-Indavalu, so far quantum of compensation awarded.

( 2 ) THE Court has head the arguments on both sides.

( 3 ) IN view of the grounds in the memorandum of appeal and at the time of hearing arguments, the following points would arise for consideration. 1. Whether the judgment of the Trial Court is legal and valid in restricting the claim of the appellant to Rs. 53,000/-?2. Whether there is any for this Court to interfere with the judgment of the Trial Court?3. What judgme

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top