SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 482

S.R.BANNURMATH
HANAMANT BASAPPA CHOUDHARI, BENNUR – Appellant
Versus
LAXMAWWA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.S.Patil, S.G.KULKARNI

S. R. BANNURMATH, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed challenging the order dated 29-4-2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Basavana Bagewadi. In Cr. Misc. No. 88 of 1997 awarding monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs. 300/- to the 1st respondent/wife and Rs. 100/- to the 2nd respondent/minor daughter as well as the order dated 6-10-2001 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bijapur, in Cri. R. P. No. 131 of 2000 affirming the same.

( 2 ) THE main grievance of the petitioner/husband is that, though there is no dispute regarding his relationship with the respondent as well as his liability to pay maintenance, in an earlier petition, viz. , Crl. Misc. No. 40 of 1987 both the parties had entered into a compromise on 30-9-1988 in which the respondents had agreed to give up their entire claim of maintenance on receipt of a lump sum amount of Rs. 9,000/- as full and final settlement of the maintenance claim and as such the present petition once again claiming maintenance is illegal. It is contended that, as long as the respondents have not got the earlier compromise order cancelled and as long as it is not contended that the petitioner has committed any fraud, coercion or mis










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top