SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 597

B.PADMARAJ
STATE OF KARANATAKA BY SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Appellant
Versus
MALLAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Shivanna, Ashok Menasinakai

PADMARAJ, J.

( 1 ) SINCE all these miscellaneous second appeals involve common questions of law and facts, and also as they arise out of the common judgments and Awards dated 29. 1. 2002, they are conveniently dealt with together.

( 2 ) LEARNED Advocate Sri A. G. Shivanna takes notice for the respondents-claimants and he is permitted to file power within three weeks from today.

( 3 ) HEARD the learned Government Advocate for the appellant- lao as well as the learned Advocate for the respondents in all these appeals and carefully perused the entire case papers including the impugned common Judgments and Awards made by the First appellate Court, with their assistance.

( 4 ) THESE Miscellaneous Second Appeals filed by the Special LAO under Section 54 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act are directed against the common Judgments and awards made by the First Appellate court, whereby, it has enhanced the compensation payable for the acquired lands of the respondents-claimants of Rs. 11,500/- per acre, on the basis of the Judgments and awards made by the Courts in similar other cases, wherein, the similar nature of lands of adjoining villages acquired under the same notification and for the ve






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top