SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 651

Karnataka High Court
KIRLOSKAR ELECTRIC COMPANY LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
NIL - Respondent
Decided On : 10-22-02
COMPANY PETITION : 97 of 2002

Advocates:
A.N.JAYARAM NAIDU, JAYARAM NAIDU, K.G.RAGHAVAN, R.B.DESHAPANDE, SAMARTHANA, U.S.SRINIVASA MURTHY, VISHWANATH SHENDGE

Headnote:Sanction of the scheme of arrangement

       (INDIAN) COMPANIES ACT, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394 -Company explaining the reasons for the scheme of arrangement -directed to publish in one news paper -held, transferor companies should comply statutory requirements under sections 391 to 394 -transferor company would only bind itself, its members and creditors -absence of the object in the scheme -hence, scheme not beneficial to the transferor company -sanction not accorded.

       [H. L. Dattu, J.] - The transferor and transferee company should make either a joint petition or separate petition as envisaged under Section 394 of the Act sub-Clause (v) of the Section is equally applicable to the transferor and the transferee company, for it cannot be the position that it is only the shareholders of the transferor company, who can dissent. The general powers contained in clause (vi) may require application both in the case of transferor company and the transferee company. If an arrangement is sanctioned and directions are given under clauses (I) and (II) of Sec.394 of the Act, on petition flied by the transferor company, then the orders so made by the Court may not bind the transferee company, its members and creditors and the same would lead to incongruous situation. The various sub-clauses of Section 394 of the Act, confirms the view that both the transferor and the transferee company should make an application under Secs.391 to 394 of the Act before the scheme of arrangement is sanctioned. Mere filing of application under Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules by the transferee companies would not satisfy the requirement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Act. Therefore, each of the companies for the scheme of arrangement must comply with the requirements of Section 391 (1) of the Act by obtaining directions, interalia for holding the meeting of the shareholders and creditors of the companies. This petition is only by the transferor company and the prayer made in the petition is to sanction the scheme of arrangement so as to be binding on all the members, secured creditors, unsecured creditors of the petitioner company, as well as on the petitioner company and that by true construction of Secs.391 to 394 of the Companies Act, the transferee company should also join in the petition and there should be meeting of the shareholders of the transferee company after obtaining directions from the Court for convening the meeting as well as approving the scheme of arrangement. Since the assets and liabilities of the petitioner company will be transferred to the transferee companies under the scheme of arrangement, the share holdings and other rights of the transferee companies would be affected and it is going to change the capital structure of the transferee companies. The transferee companies should comply with the statutory requirements as envisaged under Secs.391 to 394 of the Act and otherwise any directions issued by the Court would not bind the transferee companies, its members or creditors and any order that is made on the petition filed by the transferor company would only bind the transferor company, its members and creditors and since that Is not the object of the scheme of arrangement, the prayer made in the company petition filed by transferor company even if it is granted would not serve the purpose for which the transferor company is before the Court and such an order would not be beneficial to the transferor company in any manner whatsoever and it would be pointless even if the request made in the petition filed by the transferor company is sanc- tioned.

       Case Referred : 1992 (73) Comp. Cas. 63

H. L. DATTU, J.

( 1 ) KIRLOSKAR Electric Company has filed this company petition under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('act', for short), inter alia requesting this Court to sanction the scheme of arrangement annexed as Annexure-B to the petition, so that the same becomes binding on all the shareholders, creditors of the petitioner-company as well as on the petitioner-company.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-company was incorporated as a public limited company on 26th day of July, 1946 under the provisions of the Mysore companies Act, 1938, under the name and style of M/s. Kirloskar Electric company Limited. Its registered office is situate at the Industrial suburb, Rajajinagar, Bangalore. The authorised share capital of the company is Rs. 700,000,000 (Rupees seven hundred million) divided into 40,000,000 (forty million) equity shares of Rs. l6/- each and 3,000,000 (three million) preference shares of Rs. 100/- each. The issued, sub-scribed and paid up share capital is Rs. 25,268,817 (twenty-five million two hundred and sixty-eight thousand eight hundred and seventeen) equity shares of Rs. 10/- each and 1,800,000 (one million eight hundred thousand) preference shares of Rs. 100/- each. The main object for which the company was incorporated was to manufacture electric apparatus and appliances required for or capable of being used in connection with the generation, distribution, supply, accumulation and employment of electricity, produce a wide range of electrical motors, alternators, traction equipments, rotating machines, transformers, switchgears, voltage regulators, industrial electronics, automotive controls, etc.

( 3 ) THE petitioner-company has explained the reasons, which necessitated the formation of the scheme and also the benefits under the scheme to the company, to its shareholders and creditors. They are:"a. The petitioner-company has a dominant market position in large and medium sized rotating machines and traction equipments and over the years it has built reputation and the company enjoys goodwill in the domestic and foreign markets and the company was having sound financial position till about 1997-98. B. The company's profitability started getting affected from 1998-99 onwards on account of the recession in capital goods industry, downturn of infrastructure and core sectors, which are generally the end users of the company's products. The capital goods industry including the petitioner-company made substantial investments in the core sectors in the mid-nineties in anticipation of good demand from infrastructure and core sectors which did not materialise and thereby affecting the performance of the company and resulting in the company incurring losses. Additional interest on huge borrowings at high rate of interest exacerbated the position. Decline in sales during the last three years affecting the profit margin and competitive pressures due to over-capacity in the industry coupled with longer credit periods to customers apart from the following, are the circumstances that have necessitated the proposed arrangement. High level of debt (Rs. 305 crores); excess labour force and high employee cost of 24% of sales in the year 2000-2001; high interest cost at 23% of sales in the year 2000-2001; high level of receivables; continuing large losses; continuing poor financial situation, which can lead to reluctance on the part of the suppliers and others to continue their support; threat of legal cases from creditors/statutory authorities".

( 4 ) THE Board of Directors of the company have approved the scheme of arrangement and the scheme is annexed to the main petition. The latest audited balance-sheet is also produced as one of the annexures to the petition.

( 5 ) THE petitioner-company had filed Company Application No. 134 of 2002 under Section 391 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956, praying for directions, for convening the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors for examining and if thoug



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top