SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 682

A.V.SRINIVASA REDDY
AYESHA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
SHAHZADI – Respondent


Advocates:
G.BALAKRISHNA SHASTRI, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS

SRINIVASA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed against the concurrent findings of the courts-below rejecting the petition filed under Section 21 (1} (a) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 ('the Old Act' for short) on the ground that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-landlord filed the eviction petition alleging that a plot measuring 55' east-west and 225' north-south along with some other properties fell to her share and she was put in possession of the same. The petitioner put forth a case that the respondent-tenant is staying on a portion measuring 20' north south and 20' east west in the plot which fell to her share in the partition. Claiming that the respondent failed to pay the rents the petitioner filed the petition for eviction of the tenant under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Old Act. The Courts-below dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner holding that there was no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. Being aggrieved by the said concurrent orders of the Courts-below the present revision is filed by the petitioner.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned Counsel on both sides in this revision.

( 4







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top