( 1 ) FIRST respondent filed O. S. No. 57/1992 on the file of the Civil judge. Puttur on 14. 9. 1992 against respondents 2 to 11 (defendants 1 to 5 and 7 to 11) and Appellants (defendants 6 and 12) seeking a decree: (I) directing partition and separate possession of his 1/42nd share in the suit B schedule properties; (II) directing the defendants or such of them as are liable to render account in respect of the income received from them till date of suit and to pay future mesne profits to him at a rate to be determined by the Court till delivery of possession of the property. (III) for payment of Rs. 200/- as the cost of the lawyers notice; the plaintiff filed a valuation slip showing the actual market value of the B Schedule properties as Rs. 81,50,000/- and the market value of his 1/42nd share as Rs. 1,94,047. 61. He stated that the court Fee payable in regard to the first relief (Partition) is Rs. 200/ - under Section 35 (2) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suit Valuation act, 1958 (Act for short ). He did not value the second relief nor showed any Court Fee as a payable in regard to that relief. In regard to the third relief, that is notice charges of Rs. 200/-, the Court Fee pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document