SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Kar) 795

R.GURURAJAN
NORTH WEST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION CENTRAL OFFICE – Appellant
Versus
KARIYAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
D.VIJAYA KUMAR, MALIKARJUN REDDY, VIGHNESHVARA SHASTRY

GURURAJAN, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the North West Karnataka Road transport Corporation challenging the award dated 1. 2. 2001 passed in MVC 82 of 1996 by the Presiding Officer, Additional MACT raichur. In the said case, a claim was preferred by one Kariyappa and Smt. Seethamma seeking compensation for the death of their child on 24. 3. 1996. Matter was contested. Trial Judge has granted 1,05,000. 00 together with interest. MFA No. 2394 of 2001

( 2 ) THIS Appeal is filed Kariyappa and Seethamma challenging the very order dated 1. 2. 2001 passed by the Presiding Officer of additional MACT Raichur in MVC No. 82 of 1996. In this appeal dated 19th December 2002 they are seeking enhancement of compensation.

( 3 ) THE Corporation in MFA No. 1940 of 2001 has challenged the finding with regard to rash and negligent driving of the bus. They have also challenged the grant of compensation. In the connected appeal MFA No. 2934 of 2001 the claimants have challenged only the quantum. MFA No. 3399 of 2001:

( 4 ) THIS Appeal is filed by the claimant challenging the judgment and decree passed by the MACT No. 928 of 1994 dated 3. 4. 2001. Appellant suffered injuries and he filed MVC No. 928















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top