SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 37

K.L.MANJUNATH, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
T. B. MANJUNATH – Respondent


Advocates:
K.GOVINDARAJ, M.B.PRABHAKAR

RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) AS this petitions involve common question of law we have heard and disposed of these petitions by this common order. Facts in W. P. No. 45030/2002:1. The respondent herein approached the Karnataka administrative Tribunal in Application No. 10244/2001 alleging that he was initially appointed on daily wage basis on 1-1-1984 as a forest Watcher, that after two years there was a break as he was discharged and he was re-appointed with effect from 1-1-1992; that as he had served for more than 2400 days in a block period of 10 years, he was entitled to regularisation relying on the Government order dated 20-10-1994; that as his request was not considered, he approached the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal in Application No 3649/1999 and the Tribunal disposed of the said Application by order dated 18-8-2000 directing the petitioners herein to consider the representation and take a decision thereon; and that thereafter an endorsement dated 13-12-2000 was issued to him rejecting his request for regularization. He therefore, sought quashing of the endorsement dated 13-12-2000 and a direction to petitioners herein to regularize his services as a Forest Watcher with all co













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top