SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 27

K.SREEDHAR RAO
P. MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
BASAVARAJU – Respondent


Advocates:
R.VIJAYA KUMAR, Subba Rao

K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree passed in O. S. No. 7338/94 on the file of XXX Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore.

( 2 ) THE appeal although is at admission stage at the request of parties, taken up for final hearing. The necessary certified copy of depositions and documents are furnished by the plaintiff and the defendant for the benefit of perusal.

( 3 ) THE respondent in appeal as a plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,73,275/- with costs and interest. It is the case of the plaintiff that during the period 1-8-1990 to 5-3-1991 a sum of Rs. 1,19,500/- was paid. On several occasions it was paid by cash and one occasion by cheque for a sum of Rs. 40,000/- towards hand loan. When the hand loans were given there was no liability on the part of the defendant-appellant to pay interest. On 15-12-1991 it is said that the appellant acknowledged the liability in a sum of Rs. 1,19,500/- marked at Ex. P. 1 and also issued three cheques on 15-12-1991 for a sum of Rs. 45,000/-, on 30-5-1992 for a sum of Rs. 40,000/- and on 10-6-1992 for a sum of Rs. 34,500/ -. The cheques came to be dishonoured, proceedings were institu













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top