A.M.FAROOQ, D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
NAGESH HARIYAPPA NAYAK – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is by the plaintiff/bank which is aggrieved by the Trial Court declining to decree the suit claim as against the Guarantors also and in having decreed the suit as against the principal borrower only.
( 2 ) THE principal borrower was the first defendant in the suit and the guarantors are defendents 2 and 3 in the suit. The suit was filed for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 5,42,456-00 with current and future interest at the rate of 20. 75 % per annum and had been decreed only against the first defendant/borrower for the entire suit claim with current and future interest at 17. 5% p. a. The plaintiff/ bank has preferred this appeal questioning the decision of the Trial court in so far as it relates to the dismissal of the suit as against the guarantors.
( 3 ) THE brief facts leading to the above appeal are that the plaintiff/bank had entered into an agreement with the first defendant/ borrower to lend a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in what is known as Cash credit Hypothecation Limit Loan Transaction for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- bearing interest at 1% above the State Bank Advance rate to the minimum of 17. 5% a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.