SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 76

A.M.FAROOQ, D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
NAGESH HARIYAPPA NAYAK – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Gopal Hegde, N.Surya Prakash

SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure is by the plaintiff/bank which is aggrieved by the Trial Court declining to decree the suit claim as against the Guarantors also and in having decreed the suit as against the principal borrower only.

( 2 ) THE principal borrower was the first defendant in the suit and the guarantors are defendents 2 and 3 in the suit. The suit was filed for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 5,42,456-00 with current and future interest at the rate of 20. 75 % per annum and had been decreed only against the first defendant/borrower for the entire suit claim with current and future interest at 17. 5% p. a. The plaintiff/ bank has preferred this appeal questioning the decision of the Trial court in so far as it relates to the dismissal of the suit as against the guarantors.

( 3 ) THE brief facts leading to the above appeal are that the plaintiff/bank had entered into an agreement with the first defendant/ borrower to lend a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in what is known as Cash credit Hypothecation Limit Loan Transaction for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- bearing interest at 1% above the State Bank Advance rate to the minimum of 17. 5% a



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top