SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 60

A.V.SRINIVASA REDDY
TARA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SAKKUBAI – Respondent


Advocates:
C.N.Kamath, S.V.Tilgul

A. V. SRINIVASA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this revision filed under Section 115 of the CPC the petitioners landlords have questioned the legality and correctness of the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Chikmagalur in Revision Petition no. 10 of 1997 allowing the revision petition filed by the respondents-tenants against the orders of eviction passed by the learned Civil judge (Junior Division) in H. R. C. No. 66 of 1987. The Court below reversed the orders of eviction passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior division) and thereby dismissed the eviction petition filed by the petitioners-landlords.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to this revision, briefly stated, are as follows: the petitioners filed an eviction petition under Section 21 (1) (h) and (i) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 ('the repealed Act', for short), against late B. R. Kashinath who was the tenant under them in respect of the petition premises. The tenant, B. R. Kashinath died on 30-12-1987 during the pendency of the eviction proceedings before the additional Munsiff, Judicial Magistrate First Class at Chikmagalur. The learned Munsiff allowed the eviction petition under clauses (h) and (i) of Section 21 (1) o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top