SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 50

S.R.NAYAK, K.RAMANNA
KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CENTRAL OFFICES, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
SATHYANARAYAN – Respondent


Advocates:
H.R.RENUKA, MANIKAPPA PATIL

S. R. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the KSRTC being aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 7th April, 2000 in W. P. No. 12198 of 2000. In the above writ petition, the Corporation assailed the validity of the award of the Labour Court, Gulbarga, dated 1st March, 1999 is KID No. 471 of 1998 by which award the Labour Court had directed reinstatement of the respondent-workman with continuity of service and with full back wages.

( 2 ) THE respondent while serving in the establishment of the second appellant as conductor a charge memo dated 7-4-1995 was issued to him alleging that on 4-4-1995 while conducting the bus in question he failed to issue tickets of denomination of Rs. 2. 25 to a group of seven passengers despite collection of fares from them, with a mala fide intention to misappropriate the revenue of the Corporation. It was also alleged that in furtherance of that motive the workman had closed the waybill with reference to stage No. 9 i. e. , Koutal. The disciplinary authority not being satisfied with the explanation offered by the delinquent workman conducted a regular enquiry against the workman and finding him guilty of the charge dismissed him. That l







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top