H.N.NARAYAN
SUMANGALA L. HEGDE – Appellant
Versus
LAXMINARAYAN ANANT HEGDE – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri. S. R. Hegde, Hudlamane, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned Judgment.
( 2 ) THE short question which falls for consideration in this Revision is : whether the act of husband taking away his minor child without consent or knowledge of the mother, i. e. , his wife, amounts to cruelty to the mother under Section 498-A of I. P. C. ?
( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Vijay Kumar Sharma v. State of U. P. , (1991) 1 Crimes 298. After considering this question, the Allahabad High Court held as follows :"we are of the view that taking away the son of Smt. Savita Sharma by the petitioners in this case without information to Smt. Savita Sharma of the said fact amounts to cruelty in as much as by the said conduct of the petitioners it could be much possible that Smt. Savita Sharma could either be driven to commit suicide or it could cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. We also find that the said conduct of the petitioners, if proved, amounted to cruelty vide explanation (b) to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.