SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 122

V.GOPALA GOWDA
B. BALACHANDRA RAI – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
M.N.UMESH, Subba Rao, SUBRAMANYA BHAT

GOPALA GOWDA, J, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, who is the Personnel Officer of Indian Telephone industries (hereinafter referred to as the Company ), has filed this writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned Memorandum at annexure-P dated 19-3-1996 issued by the 2nd respondent Chairman and Managing Director of the company imposing penalty by reducing him to lower post of Grade-II with condition that he should be restored to Grade III after two years and treating the period of suspension as not spent on duty. A direction is also sought by him to grant him all the consequential benefits and to restore the order of Memorandum produced at Annexure-Q by which he was exonerated from the charges leveled against him.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are stated as under :- (I) The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed C. C. No. 2503/ 92 under of Sections 417, 419, 420 r/w 511 and 120-B I. P. C. against the petitioner and one M. V. V. Reddy, Chairman of All India Economic offences Awareness Bureau (AIEOAB), a voluntary organization engaged inter-alia in the prevention of malpractices by the big industrialists. The allegation was that they demanded amounts from some of the industries lik
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top