SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 240

R.GURURAJAN
NESTLE INDIA LIMITED, NANJANGUD – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE H DIVISION, MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
G.L.Vishwanath, M.V.CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, R.SASHIDHARAN

R. GURURAJAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER, Nestle India Limited is seeking for a direction directing the respondent to refund a sum of Rs. 77,10,277. 00 made over by the petitioner as pre-deposit before the Tribunal.

( 2 ) PETITIONER manufactures instant coffee powder falling under Chapter 21 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Petitioner had been filing price lists availing certain deductions from the sale price at depot for the purpose of determination of assessable value. Provisional assessments for the period 1991-94 were finalised by the respondent by his order dated 29-3-1996/10-5-1996. Respondent allowed deductions claimed in the said order. Respondent also ordered that the jurisdictional Superintendent should finalise the assessment from january 1995 onwards in accordance with the said order. Total amount demanded worked out to Rs. 7,87,26,491. 00. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Customs and central Excise (Appeals) challenging the rejection of claims made by the petitioner for deduction towards interest on receivables and non-recover-able taxes, such as turnover tax, octroi, etc. Appellate Authority in terms of its or










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top