SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 227

K.SREEDHAR RAO
S. G. MALLIKARJUN – Appellant
Versus
ASHA – Respondent


Advocates:
R.B.DESHAPANDE, S.P.KULKARNI

SREEDHAR RAO, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed for quashing of the proceedings in P. C. No. 38/02 on the file of C J M Bellary. The petitioners are the accused. The respondent filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr. C alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 494, 494a and 3,4 and 6 of the DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961. The Magistrate referred the complaint for investigation under Section 156 (3) of Cr P. C. and after registration of the case in Crime No. 191/02 the accused were arrested. The said proceedings are challenged as illegal and seek quashing of the same.

( 2 ) THE facts reveal that except the offence punishable under Section 494 IPC rest of the offences are cognizable and could be investigated by the Police for launching the prosecution. The provisions of Section 198 of Cr P. C. mandates that the Court shall not take cognizance of offences relating to Chapter XX of the Indian penal Code except upon a complaint by the aggrieved persons or the relatives with the leave of the Court under special envisaged circumstances. Section 494 IPC is one of the offences contemplated under Section 200 of Cr P. C. The word "complaint" is defined under section 2 (d) t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top