SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 330

K.RAMANNA
DODDAMAHADEVAIAH – Appellant
Versus
NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST, BY ITS SECRETARY, MANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
PATI A.KALAGI, R.L.Patil, R.S.KADIBAGIL, YATHISH KUMAR

NAYAK J.

( 1 ) BOTH these writ appeals are preferred against the same order of the learned Single Judge dated 10. 3. 1999 in W. P. No. 19846/1996. Hence both the writ appeals were clubbed and heard together and they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE short question that arises for our decision is whether the selection and appointment of Sri Doddamahadevaiah, who is the appellant in Writ Appeal No. 2219 of 1999 to the post of Deputy traffic Manager by the management of the New Mangalore Port trust, Mangalore (for short the management) is in accordance with law or not.

( 3 ) THE facts are not in controversy. The feeder cadre to the promotional post of Deputy Traffic Manager is Assistant Traffic manager. The appellant Doddamahadevaiah and appellant in Writ appeal No. 2255 of 1989, namely, A. Sundara Raman belong to SC community. In the final seniority list of Assistant Traffic Managers, doddamahadevaiah is placed at Sl. No. 8, whereas Sundara Raman is placed at Sl. No. 2. The post of Deputy Traffic Manager in terms of cadre and recruitment rules, has to be filled up by way of promotion by selection. When a vacancy in the post of Deputy Traffic manager, earmarked
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top