SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 367

Karnataka High Court
Rajsheker R.Nadgoud - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Decided On : 04-17-03
W.P. : 4404 of 2003

Advocates:
ARVIND DESAI, B.ANAND, B.B.BAJENTRI, B.K.MANJUNATH, B.M.SIDDAPPA, B.SHRANABASAVA, C.M.Desai, G.A.CHANDRAMOHAN, K.G.NAYAK, M.P.ESVARAPPA, P.H.VIRUPAKSHAIAH, PRABHULING K.NAVADGI, R.G.HALESHA, S.Mahesh, S.S.Guttal, S.V.PRAKASH, SANJIV V.HANCHATE, SHIVARUDRAPPA SHETKAR, U.P.VATSALA, V.N.SATHYANARAYAN

Headnote:Effect of reference etc. of a statute in another statute

       Intra reference of statutes - [H. L. Dattu, J.] -There is a distinction between a mere reference or citation of one statute into another and incorporation. In the former case a modification, repeal or re-enactment of the statute that is referred will also have effect for the statute in which it is referred, but in the latter case any change in the incorporated statute by way of amendment or repeal has no repercussion on the incorporating statute. It is a question of construction whether a particular former statute is merely referred to or cited in a later statute or is wholly or partially incorporated therein.

       Cases Referred:

       AIR 1962 SC 151; AIR 1995 SC 288; AIR 1981 SC 907; AIR 1990 SC 85; AIR 1985 SC 1041; AIR 1981 SC 2138; AIR 1988 SC 2062.

       Followed:

       AIR 1980 SC 271; AIR 1970 SC 169; AIR 1970 SC 192; AIR 1963 SC 591; AIR 1995 SC 885.

       Levy of property tax based on market value, whether discriminatory?

       Article 19 - Article 19 -Levy of Property tax -Whether State Government is competent to levy property tax based on capital value? No. It is not discriminatory.

       [H. L. Dattu, J.] -The meat argued that the imposition of tax on capital value of the lands or buildings and fixing the rate of tax at the minimum of 0.3 per cent and a maximum of 0.6 per cent is wholly unreasonable and confiscatory. Therefore, the impugned legislation requires to be struck down. This argument is an argument in despair and has no merit whatsoever. The law on the issue is now well-settled. Reference can be made to the observations of Apex Court in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax.

       Cases Referred: AIR 1962 SC 151; AIR 1995 SC 288; AIR 1981 SC 907; AIR 1990 SC 85; AIR 1985 SC 1041; AIR 1981 SC 2138; AIR 1988 SC 2062

       Followed: AIR 1980 SC 271; AIR 1970 SC 169; AIR 1970 SC 192; AIR 1963 SC 591; AIR 1995 SC 885.

       Whether State Government is competent to levy property tax based on capital value?

       KARNATAKA MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 1961

       Sections 2(27-A), 101 to 105 -Levy of Property tax -Whether State Government is competent to levy property tax based on capital value? Yes.

       [H. L. Dattu, J.] - To determine under which entry a particular tax falls, what requires to be seen is the essential features of the tax having regard to pith and substance of the legislation. Under Entry 49 of the State list, lands and buildings are units of taxation and under Entry 86 of Union list, the unit of taxation is the capital value of assets. For the purpose of levying tax under Entry 49 of List II, the State Legislature may adopt for determining the incidence of tax the annual or the capital value of the lands and buildings. In the amended provisions what has been done by the State Legislature is to authorise the local bodies to adopt "Capital Value" of the lands and buildings for the purpose of levying tax. The adoption of capital value of lands and buildings for determining the tax liability will not be a tax levied on one s total assets. Therefore, it is futile to contend that the State Legislature has no competence to levy property tax based on the capital value of the buildings or lands or both

       Cases Referred: AIR 1962 SC 151; AIR 1995 SC 288; AIR 1981 SC 907; AIR 1990 SC 85; AIR 1985 SC 1041; AIR 1981 SC 2138; AIR 1988 SC 2062

       Followed: AIR 1980 SC 271; AIR 1970 SC 169; AIR 1970 SC 192; AIR 1963 SC 591; AIR 1995 SC 885.

H. L. DATTU, J.

( 1 ) A tax reform made, for levy, assessment and collection of property tax by the State Government by amending certain provisions of Definition Clause and chapter VI "municipal Taxation" of the karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, by karnataka Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2000 (Karnataka Act No. 28 of 2001) is the subject-matter of these batch of writ petitions.

( 2 ) THE amended provisions basically provide for tax base, tax rate, coverage and collection. The first two issues involve legal and policy issue and others are machinery and procedural provisions for collection of taxes.

( 3 ) THE valuation of the property for the assessment of property tax prior to the amendment of the Act was being done on the basis of the annual rent that the property would fetch from year to year and now the Legislative entry speaks of Taxable Capital Value. Taxable value is the sum at which the property is appraised for taxation. The expression capital value used in the Act is not however the cost of construction of building or its market value as a wealth. It is a working expression, which may roughly be said to be the taxable value of the building. One of the modes commonly employed for assessing the capital value of an asset is to assess its market value if that is determinable. By inserting Clause (27-A) in the amended Act, the Legislature authorises the local bodies to make valuation of building or lands or both in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Karnataka Municipal Corporation (Amendment) Rules, 2002 for the purpose of assessment of property tax. The tax is levied every year on all buildings or lands or both situate within the municipal area, unless exempted under the act or any other law.

( 4 ) THE property tax being a presumptive tax, valuation does not increase automatically with rising prices. The location of the property determines the value of the property. There are different rates for residential and non-residential properties. The State legislature by the present amendment, authorises the local bodies to levy property tax at such rates not being less than 0. 3 percent (three thousandth) and not being more than 0. 6 per cent (six thousandth) of taxable capital value of the buildings or lands or both depending on various attributes of the buildings such as location, type of construction of the building, nature of use to which the building is put, plinth area of the building, age of the building and such other criteria as may be prescribed under the rules. The valuation of the land could be factored depending on location, area of the land and nature of use to which it is put and such other criteria as may be prescribed in the Rules for the purpose of the Act, the building is defined to mean any land appurtenant to such building used as a garden and grounds for the more beneficial enjoyment of such building, not exceeding thrice the area occupied by such building.

( 5 ) THE characteristics of imposition of tax are, firstly the essence of taxation is compulsion, that is to say, it is imposed under statutory power without the tax payers consent and the payment is enforced by law. Secondly taxation is an imposition made for a public purpose without reference to any special benefit to be conferred on the payer of tax, the tax when collected forms part of the public revenues of the State and there is no element of quid pro quo between the tax payer and the public authority. Thirdly, taxation is a part of the common burden, the quantum of imposition upon the tax payer depends generally upon his capacity to pay. Lastly taxation is for a public purpose, even if a particular person receives more benefit from the use of the tax proceeds than others. Tax has two elements; the person, thing or activity on which tax is imposed and the amount of tax.

( 6 ) THE next section focuses on the method of assessment of property tax. Property assessment is the process of arriving at the net value of property by a tax as

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top