SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 430

S.N.KUMAR
A. V. PURUSHOTAM – Appellant
Versus
N. K. NAGARAJ – Respondent


Advocates:
B.N.ANANTHA NARAYANA

KUMAR, J, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a tenant in respect of premises bearing No. 43/ 6 ground floor, Vth Main, Ganghinagar, Bangalore -9. The respondent who is the owner of the aforesaid premises has filed a suit SC No. 1603/2002 on the file of learned Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, bangalore, for ejectment of the petitioner. In the said suit, the petitioner was served with summons on 28. 10. 2002 and the petitioner appeared before Court and sought for time to file written statement. The matter was posted to 7. 12. 2002 for filing of the written statement. On that day again a request was made for extension of time for filing written statement. It was granted and the case was adjourned to 18. 1. 2003 for filing of the written statement. On that day, again a request was made for grant of some time to file written statement. However, the learned Judge refused to grant the time for filing written statement. But the learned Judge did not proceed to pass a judgment and decree as contemplated under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for not filing the written statement, but he adjourned the case for evidence to 17. 2. 2003. On 17. 2. 2003 the petitioner filed his written statement along with the app























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top