SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 513

K.BHAKTHAVATSALA
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
T. R. KRISHNAMURTHY – Respondent


BHAKTHAVATSALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Criminal Revision Petition filed by the State under section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, directed against order dated 24. 2. 1996 passed in Spl. Case no. 17/ 95 on the file of Special Judge, Bangalore, discharging the respondent/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on the ground of invalid sanction for prosecution of the respondent/accused.

( 2 ) THE Respondent/accused is represented by the learned advocate, Sri A. V. Srinivas.

( 3 ) FOR the purpose of convenience, the Respondent is referred to as the Accused as arraigned in the Trial Court.

( 4 ) THE brief facts of the case leading to the Revision Petition may be stated as under: the Respondent / Accused being a Public Servant, while officiating as a Sub-Inspector of Police, Bidadi Police Station on 3. 8. 1993, demanded a bribe of Rs. 1,500/- from the Complainant/sri s. V. Ravi for showing an offical favour ie. , for not registering a case against him and in furtherance of the demand, the Accused received a part payment of Rs. 500/- from the Complainant on the very same












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top