SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Kar) 489

H.L.DATTU
URUKUNDI – Appellant
Versus
SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE – Respondent


Advocates:
M.C.Narasimhan, NARAYANSWAMY, V.C.BRAHMAIAYAPPA

DATTU, J, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent - Divisional Office of the Life Insurance corporation of India ( the Corporation for short) had invited applications for appointment to the posts of Typists and Sub-staff for its Raichur divisional office. In this Writ Petition we are only concerned with the appointments made to the post of Sub-Staff in the Corporation. In the employment notice, the qualification that was prescribed for the post of Sub-staff is that, the applicant should have passed IX standard examination and the candidates who have passed SSLC examination with less than 55% of marks in the aggregate were also permitted to participate in the selection process.

( 2 ) PETITIONER who is a graduate, had stalked his claim by filling up the prescribed proforma application and filing the same before the respondent - Corporation Copy of the application is produced by the respondent - Corporation along with their statement of objection. The application requires to be filled by the applicants in their own hand writing. In Column 8 of the application, the applicant is required to state his qualification as on the date of filing of the application and if he is still prosecuting his studies tha
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top