( 1 ) THE correctness and the legality of the order passed by the court-below dismissing IA No. 9 filed by the petitioner for stopping of all further proceedings in HRC 1068/2000 is being challenged in this revision by the petitioner-tenant.

( 2 ) THE respondents herein filed HRC 1068/2000 against the petitioner-tenant in the II Addl Small Causes Judge, Bangalore under Sec 21 (1) (a) and (h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the repealed Act) seeking an order of eviction against the petitioner. The petitioner filed his statement of objections denying the relationship of landlord and tenant between him and the respondents. It was stated by him in the statement of objections that he was a tenant under one Mirza Askar Ali and after his death as many persons claimed to be his legal representatives he was constrained to file HRC 1471/98 and deposited rents in those proceedings The present eviction proceedings is filed by the respondents claiming to be the owners of the petition premises having purchased the same from the legal representatives of the deceased Mirza Asker Ali The petitioner relies heavily upon the order passed in HRC 1471/98 whereunder th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document